Poverty in Social Sciences Research

Poverty in Social Sciences Research


By highlighting the different outcomes that hinder the growth and realization of organizations in the contemporary environment, individuals can identify different approaches that influence their focus towards issues affecting their lifestyles. In this paper, the relationship between methodology and epistemology will be explored to identify the significance of the two aspects in scholarly studies. Likewise, the influence of knowledge organization in research process will also be discussed to influence the readers about their ability to develop innovative findings in the community. By embracing the interpretivist theory, this paper will highlight the recommended scholarly approaches researchers should use when developing solutions to respond to topical issues. Hence, poverty manifests itself as situational, generation, and absolute forms that affect people’s ability to interact with other individuals in their surroundings.

The Link Between Methodology and Epistemology

The approaches used by scholars to identify their desired objectives and develop findings that solve topical issues might vary as one interacts with different disciplines in their immediate environment. Utilizing theoretical concepts as a foundation to establishing the cause of different outcomes might be subjected to additional research studies that are focused on developing evidence-based outcomes.On its part, epistemology highlights the knowledge people have regarding different topical issues affecting people in their immediate environment (Stoeffler& Joseph, 2019).Identifying the right sources of information enables scholars to gather participants who can take part in research methods such as answering questionnaires and responding to questions. Even though there are different techniques, people can use to accomplish their desired objectives, highlighting the issues researchers can address, such as poverty yields positive outcomes in society.

In Knowledge Organization (KO), researchers formulate certain pointers that guide them in their approach towards various topical issues such as poverty (Stoeffler& Joseph, 2019). In their approaches, scholars focus on representation and the role of the system in influencing people’s perspectives towards life. Different epistemic stances dictate the perspectives people have towards certain issues that affect individual lifestyles. For instance, poverty is perceived differently by individuals around the world, compelling scholars to dig deeper to develop a standard definition that rules out bias when promoting the understanding of the issue at hand (Jindra & Jindra, 2018). Considering the different aspects of information that people can access, the understanding of societal problems is significantly influenced by the epistemic stances that exist in contemporary society. Therefore, when designing a research methodology, scholars must acknowledge the different perspectives held by individuals towards the study topic.

The Positivist Approach to Methodology

Katiyatiya (2020) believes that positivism is guided by distinct principles that define the nature of approaches researchers can use to respond to queries on topical issues. Depending on the tactics embraced by researchers on demystifying problems in the world today, individuals must understand the origin of certain ideals that inspire the standard way of viewing problems. For instance, positivism requires researchers to focus on explaining and predicting the outcomes by developing a hypothesis that acts as a guide in scholarly work (Katiyatiya, 2020).Observing the behaviour of participants during the interview sessions provides an opportunity to scholars where they can develop findings that highlight the impact of certain approaches in contemporary society. Despite the desire to accomplish the research objectives, the research approach should majorly rely on the ability of the scholars to use standard measures across different disciplines.

The Interpretivist Approach to Methodology

When collecting data for research activity, researchers are entitled to use certain methods that enable them to understand the causes of topical issues and their impact on selected population groups. When exploring poverty and its implication on the human race, scholars focus on developing a broad perspective that widens their scope on the social problem. Using tactics such as observation and interpretation of participant feedback enables individuals to formulate informed opinions regarding the impact of the chosen issue on people’s perspectives. Interviews and observation play a significant role in aiding researchers to gain knowledge on poverty as a scholarly topic and develop credible findings that enable them to provide viable solutions to the public.

The interpretive approach integrates human interests in a research study where scholars can develop credible findings by engaging a sample population that represents the views of a larger group in the community.Idealism provokes the thought process of individuals by exposing them to practical situations that enhance reflection and the ability of the public to relate to different issues, which influence their perspectives on poverty. Researchers under the interpretive approach should acknowledge the differences that define individuals and their ability to overcome numerous challenges that shape the identity of different population groups in their surroundings. Therefore, symbolic interactionism (theory developed from viable considerations) and hermeneutics (theory of interpretation) define the approaches researchers can use when demystifying poverty and analyzing its impact on the general public.

Factors that Influence a Researcher’s Choice of Methodology

When studying a specified issue affecting the public, researchers approach the problem from the point of information that acts as a guide towards the execution of various methodologies. Developing a hypothesis defines the researcher’s angle and his or her ability to identify the causes of the topical issue. However, scholars must maintain an open mind when interacting with different individuals and acknowledge the differences that define the actual identity of the distinct population groups. Recognizing these differences creates an enabling environment where researchers can pursue a common understanding of poverty and match it with existing literature on the study issue.

Large surveys and observations are time-consuming and expensive to conduct because of the consistent interaction with people and the tedious process of collecting information. Scholars review the cost of conducting a research study because of its impact on the nature of findings that are retrieved from the research exercise. Besides, the cost of conducting the project and the time taken to review the findings is a key determinant of the choice of methodology embraced by scholars. However, the aims of the entire research activity might overlook the aspects of cost because of the desired expectations that must be measured to develop accurate and credible results that inform the public on poverty. Since the problem is broad, deploying specific methodologies might be key to the realization of issues affecting the public.


Poverty manifests itself as situational, generation, and absolute forms that affect people’s ability to interact with other individuals in their surroundings. Different theorists have explored the concept of poverty and how it influences outcomes in the modern world. Depending on the understanding of individuals concerning poverty, many arguments that describe the outcome focus on its impact on people’s lifestyles and how it influences their perspectives towards life. For instance, social stratification highlights the consequences of poverty and how low-income earners encounter social discrimination, racism, and sexism. Therefore, acknowledge the influence of positivism and interpretivism in research enables researchers to develop credible findings that influence their focus towards the study topic.




Jindra, I. W., & Jindra, M. (2018). Connecting poverty, culture, and cognition: The bridges out of poverty process. Journal of Poverty22(1), 42-64.

Katiyatiya, L. M. (2020). PART A: Socio-economic inequality in South Africa and the continual plight for social protection in the future world of work. Journal of Poverty24(3), 203-221.

MN, K. (2018). ‘Policing the poor’and ‘poor policing’in a global city. Journal of Poverty22(3), 209-227.

Stoeffler, S. W., & Joseph, R. (2019). Poverty and Social Justice: The Building Stones of Social Work Identity. Journal of Poverty, 1-16.



Looking for help with your homework?
Grab a 30% Discount and Get your paper done!

30% OFF
Turnitin Report
Title Page
Place an Order

Cite this Page

Poverty in Social Sciences Research . (2021, November 10). The Studypool . Retrieved July 19, 2024, from https://www.thestudypool.com/samples/poverty-in-social-sciences-research/
“ Poverty in Social Sciences Research .” The Studypool , 10 Nov. 2021, www.thestudypool.com/samples/poverty-in-social-sciences-research/
Poverty in Social Sciences Research . [online]. Available at: <https://www.thestudypool.com/samples/poverty-in-social-sciences-research/> [Accessed 19 Jul. 2024].
Poverty in Social Sciences Research [Internet]. The Studypool . 2021 Nov 10 [cited 2024 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.thestudypool.com/samples/poverty-in-social-sciences-research/
Grab A 14% Discount on This Paper
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -